Wheeler v. Emmeluth

7 N.Y.S. 807, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 737, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 807 (Wheeler v. Emmeluth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler v. Emmeluth, 7 N.Y.S. 807, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 737, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Pratt, j.

It was undoubtedly irregular to enter an order without notice

to the owner of the judgments, but the owner had an opportunity to be heard upon the merits when he made his motion to vacate the order, and no fact was proved or reason suggested to show that the order, as entered, was not right. So far as appears, precisely such an order would have to be again entered in case it was set aside for the irregularity complained of. The plaintiff should have shown upon his motion to vacate the order that he had been prejudiced by the entry of the order without notice. Under all the circumstances, we think the order should stand. Order affirmed, but without costs. All concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.Y.S. 807, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 737, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-emmeluth-nysupct-1889.