Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education
326 F.2d 759
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 1964·No. No. 9184·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The order of the District Court is affirmed as an appropriate interim decree. The School Board is at liberty to propose at any time a revised plan for desegregation, and the District Court is fully empowered to deal with it in accordance with this court’s earlier opinion. Jeffers v. Whitley, 309 F.2d 621 (1962).
See also D.C., 210 F.Supp. 839, rev. 4 Cir., 309 F.2d 630.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 326 F.2d 759 (4th Cir. 1964).
326 F.2d 759 (Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warren H. Wheeler, and C. C. Spaulding v. The Durham City Board of Education, Warren H. Wheeler, and C. C. Spaulding v. The Durham City Board of Education
585 F.2d 618 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education
585 F.2d 618 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)
Warren H. Wheeler, and C. C. Spaulding, III v. The Durham City Board of Education, a Body Politic in Durham County, North Carolina
346 F.2d 768 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)