Wheeler v. Carr

137 A.D. 929, 123 N.Y.S. 1149

This text of 137 A.D. 929 (Wheeler v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler v. Carr, 137 A.D. 929, 123 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the court properly exercised its discretion. All concurred, except Spring arid Williams, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the motion was granted on the sole ground that the plaintiff was a non-resident of the State, and not as matter of discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.D. 929, 123 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-carr-nyappdiv-1910.