Wheeler v. Carpenter
This text of 9 Ind. 153 (Wheeler v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case a complaint was filed to obtain specific performance of an agreement. Demurrer to the complaint sustained; and judgment for the defendant.
The error assigned is the sustaining of the demurrer. But no exception was taken to that ruling of the Court.
The judgment is affirmed with costs
See Zehnor v. Beard, 8 Ind. R. 96; Minor v. The State, id. 424; Ricketts v. The Board, &c. id. 452; Plummer v. McLean, id. 457; Marvin v. Carter, id. 462; Jolly v. The Terre Haute Bridge Co., in this volume, and authorities there cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ind. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-carpenter-ind-1857.