Wheeler v. Board of Medical Examiners

276 P. 1119, 98 Cal. App. 267, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 575
California Court of Appeal·Decided April 12, 1929·No. Docket No. 6797.·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal. It appears from the record that the judgment appealed from was entered November 27, 1928. The time for taking an appeal expired sixty *Page 268 days thereafter or on January 26, 1929. The notice of appeal was filed February 14, 1929. No notice of intention to move for a new trial or notice of motion for a new trial has ever been made or filed. Appellants claim that as no findings of fact or conclusions of law have ever been filed, judgment has never been rendered and the sixty-day period has not therefore commenced to run. [1] No findings were necessary. The judgment sought to be appealed from was decided upon a question of law. Nor was notice of the entry of judgment necessary. [2] Section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not require the service of notice of entry of judgment in order to set the time running within which an appeal from a judgment may be taken. (Schainman v. Kierce,199 Cal. 249 [248 P. 905].)

It follows that the appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler v. Board of Medical Examiners, 276 P. 1119, 98 Cal. App. 267, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 575 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

276 P. 1119 (Wheeler v. Board of Medical Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
67 Cal. App. 3d 19 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Coast Elevator Co. v. State Board of Equalization
44 Cal. App. 3d 576 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit Appeals
245 Cal. App. 2d 160 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Carnation Co. v. Marcevich
186 Cal. App. 2d 618 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Martin v. Smith
184 Cal. App. 2d 571 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Wadler v. Justice Court of Merced Judicial District
301 P.2d 907 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Smith & Wesson, Inc. v. Municipal Court
289 P.2d 26 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Estate of Kearns
278 P.2d 85 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
Mallarino v. Hammersmith
278 P.2d 85 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)