Wheeler v. Board of Control of State Public School

Michigan Supreme Court

Wheeler v. Board of Control of State Public School

100 N.W. 394, 137 Mich. 291, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 557

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 16, 1904

DocketDocket No. 125

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 100 N.W. 394 (Wheeler v. Board of Control of State Public School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheeler v. Board of Control of State Public School, 100 N.W. 394, 137 Mich. 291, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 557 (Mich. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit against the defendant upon a contract for installing a heating plant in the State public school at Coldwater. At the time the contract was made the statute provided:

“The members of said board shall constitute a body corporate under the name and style of the Board of Control of the State Public School with the right of suing and being sued, of making and using a common seal and altering it at pleasure.” 1 Comp. Laws, § 2021.

In May, 1903, prior to the commencement of this suit, the legislature took away from this board of control its •corporate powers, thereby repealing the provision authorizing it to sue and be sued. Act No. 143, Pub. Acts 1903. The defendant filed a special plea in abatement, to which [292]*292the plaintiffs demurred. The demurrer was overruled, and the plea sustained. The right to sue and be sued conferred upon the board by the original act did not form a part of the contract. The State may grant the right to bring suit against it, and it may at any time take that right away, without impairing the obligation of its contracts. Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How. 529; Board of Public Works v. Gannt, 76 Va. 455; Ex parte Alabama, 52 Ala. 231 (23 Am. Rep. 567); Board of Sup’rs of Sanilac Co. v. Auditor General, 68 Mich. 659 (36 N. W. 794).

Judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit against the defendant upon a contract for installing a heating plant in the State public school at Coldwater. At the time the contract was made the statute provided:

“The members of said board shall constitute a body corporate under the name and style of the Board of Control of the State Public School with the right of suing and being sued, of making and using a common seal and altering it at pleasure.” 1 Comp. Laws, § 2021.

In May, 1903, prior to the commencement of this suit, the legislature took away from this board of control its •corporate powers, thereby repealing the provision authorizing it to sue and be sued. Act No. 143, Pub. Acts 1903. The defendant filed a special plea in abatement, to which [292]*292the plaintiffs demurred. The demurrer was overruled, and the plea sustained. The right to sue and be sued conferred upon the board by the original act did not form a part of the contract. The State may grant the right to bring suit against it, and it may at any time take that right away, without impairing the obligation of its contracts. Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How. 529; Board of Public Works v. Gannt, 76 Va. 455; Ex parte Alabama, 52 Ala. 231 (23 Am. Rep. 567); Board of Sup’rs of Sanilac Co. v. Auditor General, 68 Mich. 659 (36 N. W. 794).

Judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 N.W. 394, 137 Mich. 291, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-board-of-control-of-state-public-school-mich-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack