Wheeler v. Anglim
This text of 79 N.E. 810 (Wheeler v. Anglim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exceptions in this case relate to the admission and exclusion of evidence. The opinions of the plaintiffs as to the value of their services were competent. They were experts. The relations of the defendant to other architects, not made known to the plaintiffs, were immaterial. Other testimony, to the exclusion of which exception was taken, was given by the same witness in another part of the case, and the defendant was not injured by its exclusion. The defendant has not pointed out any error in the rulings, and we do not discover any.
Exceptions overruled with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.E. 810, 193 Mass. 600, 1907 Mass. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-v-anglim-mass-1907.