Wheeler (Richard A.) v. State of California, Dept. Of Forestry, State of California, Board of Forestry, Kuhl (Peter R.), Martinez (John), Vaux (Henry J.), Cromwell (Dean A.), Martin (Edward F.), Moore (Howard E.), Scatena (Daniel Robert), Delfino (Kenneth), Schoenheide (Richard, I), Hunt (Richard H.), Burke (Jerry), Gromacki (Jerome), Vodonick (John), Williams (Christopher)

825 F.2d 414
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 1987·No. 86-1911·Published

Opinion

825 F.2d 414

Wheeler (Richard A.)
v.
State of California, Dept. of Forestry, State of California,
Board of Forestry, Kuhl (Peter R.), Martinez (John), Vaux
(Henry J.), Cromwell (Dean A.), Martin (Edward F.), Moore
(Howard E.), Scatena (Daniel Robert), Delfino (Kenneth),
Schoenheide (Richard, I), Hunt (Richard H.), Burke (Jerry),
Gromacki (Jerome), Vodonick (John), Williams (Christopher)

NO. 86-1911

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

AUG 04, 1987

Appeal From: N.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler (Richard A.) v. State of California, Dept. Of Forestry, State of California, Board of Forestry, Kuhl (Peter R.), Martinez (John), Vaux (Henry J.), Cromwell (Dean A.), Martin (Edward F.), Moore (Howard E.), Scatena (Daniel Robert), Delfino (Kenneth), Schoenheide (Richard, I), Hunt (Richard H.), Burke (Jerry), Gromacki (Jerome), Vodonick (John), Williams (Christopher), 825 F.2d 414 (9th Cir. 1987).

825 F.2d 414 (Wheeler (Richard A.) v. State of California, Dept. Of Forestry, State of California, Board of Forestry, Kuhl (Peter R.), Martinez (John), Vaux (Henry J.), Cromwell (Dean A.), Martin (Edward F.), Moore (Howard E.), Scatena (Daniel Robert), Delfino (Kenneth), Schoenheide (Richard, I), Hunt (Richard H.), Burke (Jerry), Gromacki (Jerome), Vodonick (John), Williams (Christopher)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.