Wheeler, Andrew Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
DocketWR-82,390-01
StatusPublished

This text of Wheeler, Andrew Earl (Wheeler, Andrew Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheeler, Andrew Earl, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,390-01

EX PARTE ANDREW EARL WHEELER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1428895-A IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possessing

cocaine and was sentenced to imprisonment. There was no direct appeal.

No testing had been done on the alleged drugs at the time of Applicant’s guilty plea. Since

the plea, testing was completed and no cocaine was found. The trial court, with the State’s

agreement, recommends granting relief. According to this Court’s decision in Ex parte Mable, 443

S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), under these circumstances, Applicant’s guilty plea is

considered involuntary. Even so, the lab report in the habeas record indicates that, although the drug -2-

evidence seized and tested was not cocaine as alleged in the information (indictment was waived),

the evidence was approximately 1.08 grams of methamphetamine and approximately 1.0 gram of

dihydrocodeinone.

The trial court’s recommendation is supported by the record and applicable law. Relief is

granted. See Ex parte Mable, supra. The judgment in Cause No. 142889501010 in the 248th District

Court of Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris

County to answer the charge. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days

after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: January 14, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wheeler, Andrew Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheeler-andrew-earl-texcrimapp-2015.