Wheatley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 5, 2019
Docket17-697
StatusUnpublished

This text of Wheatley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Wheatley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheatley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2019).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0697V Filed: January 31, 2019 UNPUBLISHED

JOSEPH L. WHEATLEY,

Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Shoulder HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent.

Anthony P. Ellis, Ellis Law Group, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for petitioner. Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On May 25, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused in fact by the tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine he received on August 15, 2016. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 23. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 13, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for his SIRVA. On January 31, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $117,924.67,

1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). representing $424.00 in first year life care expenses, $2,575.80 in lost wages, $110,000.00 in pain and suffering, and $4,924.87 in past unreimbursable expenses, and an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in Section II.B. of the Proffer. Proffer at 1-4. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 1-3. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards the following:

A. A lump sum in the amount of $117,924.67, representing compensation in the amount of $424.00 for life care expenses in the first year after judgment, compensation in the amount of $2,575.80 for lost wages, compensation in the amount of $110,000.00 for pain and suffering, and compensation in the amount of $4,924.87 for actual unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Joseph L. Wheatley;

B. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in Proffer Section II.B.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Petitioner,

v. No. 17-697V Chief Special Master Dorsey SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Laura Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CDDN, CLCP, to

provide an estimation of Joseph L. Wheatley’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the

purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described in the respondent’s Rule 4(c)

Report, filed April 12, 2018. All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are

supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of

Compensation for Joseph L. Wheatley, attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that

Joseph L. Wheatley should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life care plan

and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Joseph L. Wheatley has

suffered past loss of earnings. Therefore, respondent proffers that Joseph L. Wheatley should be

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment. -1- awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A).

Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for Joseph L. Wheatley’s lost earnings is

$2,575.80. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Joseph L. Wheatley should be awarded $110,000.00 in actual

and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Joseph L. Wheatley’s expenditure of past

unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that

petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $4,924.87.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to Joseph L. Wheatley should be

made through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described

below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the

following:2

A. A lump sum payment of $117,924.67, representing compensation for life care

expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($424.00), lost earnings

($2,575.80), pain and suffering ($110,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($4,924.87), in

the form of a check payable to petitioner, Joseph L. Wheatley.

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wheatley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatley-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2019.