Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan

Tenth Circuit

Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan

192 F.2d 376, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2724

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 1951

Docket4364

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 F.2d 376 (Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan, 192 F.2d 376, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2724 (10th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The application wholly failed to allege that the petitioner had applied for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or that the court which sentenced him had denied him relief under that section, and that the remedy by motion under that section was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The application wholly failed to allege that the petitioner had applied for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or that the court which sentenced him had denied him relief under that section, and that the remedy by motion under that section was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

The order is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F.2d 376, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatley-v-hunter-warden-u-s-penitentiary-leavenworth-kan-ca10-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack