Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan

Tenth Circuit

Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan

192 F.2d 376, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2724

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 26, 1951·No. 4364·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The application wholly failed to allege that the petitioner had applied for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or that the court which sentenced him had denied him relief under that section, and that the remedy by motion under that section was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The application wholly failed to allege that the petitioner had applied for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or that the court which sentenced him had denied him relief under that section, and that the remedy by motion under that section was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.

The order is affirmed.

Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan, 192 F.2d 376, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2724 (10th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

192 F.2d 376 (Wheatley v. Hunter, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related