Wheatland v. Hart

California Court of Appeal

Wheatland v. Hart

110 Cal. App. 762

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 6, 1930

DocketCiv. No. 177

StatusPublished

This text of 110 Cal. App. 762 (Wheatland v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheatland v. Hart, 110 Cal. App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

WARMER, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for libel. The question presented on this appeal is precisely the same as presented in the case of Wheatland v. Maloney et al., Civil No. 178 (ante, p. 288 [294 Pac. 499]). On the authority of Wheatland v. Maloney this day decided, the judgment is affirmed.

Cary, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on- February 2, 1931.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARMER, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for libel. The question presented on this appeal is precisely the same as presented in the case of Wheatland v. Maloney et al., Civil No. 178 (ante, p. 288 [294 Pac. 499]). On the authority of Wheatland v. Maloney this day decided, the judgment is affirmed.

Cary, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on- February 2, 1931.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 Cal. App. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatland-v-hart-calctapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack