Wheatland v. Gray

6 Mass. 124
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Mass. 124 (Wheatland v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheatland v. Gray, 6 Mass. 124 (Mass. 1809).

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

This cause also comes before us on a case stated by the parties, as did the case of Cook vs. The Essex Fire and Marine Insurance Company. And by comparing the cases, it appears that Wheatland and Cook were joint owners of the brigantine and cargo; that the policy declared on in this case, and executed by the defendant, is in all respects similar to Cook’policy, executed by the Essex Fire and Marine Insurance Com pony, and that the facts in the two cases are substantially the same. In both cases, therefore, similar judgments must be entered ; and as, in Cook’s action, we gave judgment against him, so, in this action, we are of the same opinion, that on the case agreed, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover any thing of [*1£5] * the defendant; and that judgment must be rendered that the said Wheatland take nothing by his writ, and that the said Gray recover his costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Archibald v. Mercantile Insurance
20 Mass. 70 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)
Shapley v. Tappan
9 Mass. 20 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)
Lee v. Gray
7 Mass. 349 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1811)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Mass. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatland-v-gray-mass-1809.