Wheatfall v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Wheatfall v. Director of Patuxent Institution

236 Md. 623

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedOctober 19, 1964

DocketApp. No. 40

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 Md. 623 (Wheatfall v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheatfall v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 236 Md. 623 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency raises questions as to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. The testimony of Dr. Boslow was alone sufficient to support the jury’s finding. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641 (1964). That case, and the cases therein cited, make it clear that Dr. Boslow’s conclusions were not improperly admitted, even though based in part on the reports of other staff members.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency raises questions as to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. The testimony of Dr. Boslow was alone sufficient to support the jury’s finding. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641 (1964). That case, and the cases therein cited, make it clear that Dr. Boslow’s conclusions were not improperly admitted, even though based in part on the reports of other staff members.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 Md. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheatfall-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack