Wheat v. Caruthers

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Wheat v. Caruthers

439 So. 2d 1098, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 10050

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 29, 1983

DocketNo. 82 CA 0382

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 So. 2d 1098 (Wheat v. Caruthers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wheat v. Caruthers, 439 So. 2d 1098, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 10050 (La. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In its application for a rehearing, the plaintiff, Wheat, Incorporated, contends that Glynn Caruthers is not an indispensable party because in a possessory action entitled “Samuel G. Caruthers versus Darryl J. Cavalier, et al., No. 51,012 on the docket of the Twenty-second Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, Louisiana,” Mr. Caruthers had dismissed his action with prejudice. Evidence of the suit and its dismissal were not before the Court on the original hearing, 428 So.2d 1037. The record does not reflect that the posses-sory action or its dismissal were ever introduced or filed into evidence in the present action. This Court cannot review evidence that is not in the record, and cannot receive evidence so as to supplement the record. Good v. Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics, 370 So.2d 123 (La.1979), writ denied 371 So.2d 836 (La.1979).

[1099]*1099Thus, we deny the rehearing.

REHEARING DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In its application for a rehearing, the plaintiff, Wheat, Incorporated, contends that Glynn Caruthers is not an indispensable party because in a possessory action entitled “Samuel G. Caruthers versus Darryl J. Cavalier, et al., No. 51,012 on the docket of the Twenty-second Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, Louisiana,” Mr. Caruthers had dismissed his action with prejudice. Evidence of the suit and its dismissal were not before the Court on the original hearing, 428 So.2d 1037. The record does not reflect that the posses-sory action or its dismissal were ever introduced or filed into evidence in the present action. This Court cannot review evidence that is not in the record, and cannot receive evidence so as to supplement the record. Good v. Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics, 370 So.2d 123 (La.1979), writ denied 371 So.2d 836 (La.1979).

[1099]*1099Thus, we deny the rehearing.

REHEARING DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

439 So. 2d 1098, 1983 La. App. LEXIS 10050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheat-v-caruthers-lactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack