Whatley v. Baynard

264 A.2d 721, 437 Pa. 498, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 908
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 1970·No. Appeal, 322·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Pee Cubiam,

This is an appeal from an order entered below striking from the record a judgment of non pros, in an action seeking damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident.

In striking the judgment, the court took into consideration facts outside the record. This was error. A motion to strike off a judgment of non pros., regular on its face, challenges only defects appearing on the face of the record. Cox v. Felice Perri & Sons, 412 Pa. 415, 195 A. 2d 79 (1963). However, since the facts which moved the learned court below to strike the judgment appear to have sufficient merit to warrant the court in the exercise of its discretion to open the judgment, and the court below could properly treat the motion to strike as one to open, 1 we will vacate the order appealed from and remand the record for the purpose of permitting the court below to consider the motion as one to open the judgment.

It is so ordered.

1

Mazer v. Sargent Electric Co., 407 Pa. 169, 180 A. 2d 63 (1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whatley v. Baynard, 264 A.2d 721, 437 Pa. 498, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 908 (Pa. 1970).

264 A.2d 721 (Whatley v. Baynard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vranka, S. v. Sampson, S.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2023
Cargitlada v. Binks Manufacturing Co.
837 A.2d 547 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Kophazy v. Kophazy
421 A.2d 246 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
In Re Estate of McCauley
385 A.2d 1324 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Saint Vladimir Ukrainian Orthodox Church v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance
362 A.2d 1052 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
272 A.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)