What v. Kuriyama
This text of What v. Kuriyama (What v. Kuriyama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JUN-2022 12:17 PM Dkt. 9 OGP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
SALLY WHAT, aka Shawn Fabio, Petitioner
vs.
THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE E. KURIYAMA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge
and
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Case No. 1PC111001135)
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Sally What’s, aka
Shawn Fabio’s, petition for a writ of mandamus and respondent
State of Hawaiʻi’s answer,
It is ordered that the petition for a writ of mandamus
is granted. The respondent judge shall:
1. Vacate the Amended Order Revoking Conditional
Release, filed on January 20, 2022. 2. Hold the evidentiary hearing required by HRS § 704-413(4). DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 7, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
What v. Kuriyama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/what-v-kuriyama-haw-2022.