Wharton v. State

240 S.W. 310, 91 Tex. Crim. 575, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 295
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 26, 1922·No. No. 6915.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

—Upon trial under an indictment charging assault with intent to rape appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100, and imprisonment in the county jail for one year.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Many alleged errors are set up in the motion for new trial, none of which can be considered by us in the absence of verification by bills of exception and in the absence of a statement of the facts. The charge submitted to the jury only the issue of aggravated assault, and is applicable to a case provable under the indictment. In the condition of the record we must presume the trial was regular, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wharton v. State, 240 S.W. 310, 91 Tex. Crim. 575, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 295 (Tex. 1922).

240 S.W. 310 (Wharton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stapler v. State
47 S.W.2d 837 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)