Wharton v. Roth

Second Circuit

Wharton v. Roth

360 F.2d 166

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 5, 1966·No. No. 379, Docket 30332·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the order of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York which granted a writ of attachment, at the instance of the plaintiff-trustee in bankruptcy, against a bank account and other property of a former director of Continental Vending Machine Corp. and Continental Apeo Inc., the debtor corporations. The defendant director is charged in this suit with participating in a conspiracy to divert and dissipate the assets of the debtors in a fraudulent manner. The order of attachment is affirmed with the understanding that there will be such further proceedings in the district court as may be necessary with respect to the filing by the plaintiff-trustee of an attachment bond which the plaintiff has agreed to file.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the order of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York which granted a writ of attachment, at the instance of the plaintiff-trustee in bankruptcy, against a bank account and other property of a former director of Continental Vending Machine Corp. and Continental Apeo Inc., the debtor corporations. The defendant director is charged in this suit with participating in a conspiracy to divert and dissipate the assets of the debtors in a fraudulent manner. The order of attachment is affirmed with the understanding that there will be such further proceedings in the district court as may be necessary with respect to the filing by the plaintiff-trustee of an attachment bond which the plaintiff has agreed to file.

Wharton v. Roth, 360 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

360 F.2d 166 (Wharton v. Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related