Wharton v. Lowrey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

Wharton v. Lowrey

29 F. Cas. 855, 2 U.S. 364, 2 Dall. 364

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1796

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 29 F. Cas. 855 (Wharton v. Lowrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wharton v. Lowrey, 29 F. Cas. 855, 2 U.S. 364, 2 Dall. 364 (circtdpa 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

Considerations respecting the merits of the cause ought not to weigh in the determination of the present question. The complainant could not foresee that the statute of limitations would be pleaded, and it is in order to bring before the court an essential fact arising from that plea, that the amendment is proposed. The rule made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. Cas. 855, 2 U.S. 364, 2 Dall. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wharton-v-lowrey-circtdpa-1796.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack