Wharton v. Barry
1 How. Pr. 60
This text of 1 How. Pr. 60 (Wharton v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wharton v. Barry, 1 How. Pr. 60 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).
Opinion
[61]*61Denied with costs, on a defective affidavit of merits. That part of the affidavit is as follows: “ the defendant has a good substantial defence therein upon the merits, as he is advised by the counsel above named, and verily believed to be true.” The word believed should be believes. Plaintiff’s counsel alleged the same point had before been decided by Judge Cowen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wharton-v-barry-nysupct-1844.