Wharen v. Dershuck
108 A. 18, 264 Pa. 562, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 698
Opinion
In this action for libel the verdict was for the defendant, followed by judgment thereon. After due consideration of all the assignments of error the majority of the court are of opinion that they disclose no reversible error, in view of all the testimony in the case, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wharen v. Dershuck, 108 A. 18, 264 Pa. 562, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 698 (Pa. 1919).
108 A. 18 (Wharen v. Dershuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
485 A.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Duh v. Bethlehem's Globe Publishing Co.
48 Pa. D. & C.2d 268 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1969)
Rossi v. McDonnell
18 Pa. D. & C.2d 550 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1959)
Williams v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.
1 A.2d 495 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Stevenson v. Morris
136 A. 234 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)