Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999)

Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1999
DocketNo. 546931
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274 (Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT
In this case, the court finds the issues for the plaintiff and orders judgment in its favor in the amount of $5,092.70.

The court finds that under Connecticut General Statutes §14-65f(b) that the plaintiff had written authorization to perform repairs on the defendant's vehicle. It then notified the customer of the work to be done and its cost. The defendant gave oral authorization which the plaintiff duly recorded on the invoice. Accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to recover for cost of the repairs he actually performed.

D. Michael Hurley Judge Trial Referree

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 14-65f
Connecticut § 14-65f(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whaling-city-ford-v-concrete-express-no-546931-oct-26-1999-connsuperct-1999.