Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 26, 1999·No. No. 546931·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT
In this case, the court finds the issues for the plaintiff and orders judgment in its favor in the amount of $5,092.70.

The court finds that under Connecticut General Statutes §14-65f(b) that the plaintiff had written authorization to perform repairs on the defendant's vehicle. It then notified the customer of the work to be done and its cost. The defendant gave oral authorization which the plaintiff duly recorded on the invoice. Accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to recover for cost of the repairs he actually performed.

D. Michael Hurley Judge Trial Referree

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 14274 (Whaling City Ford v. Concrete Express, No. 546931 (Oct. 26, 1999)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 14-65f
Connecticut § 14-65f(b)