Whaley v. United States

141 F.2d 1010, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3844
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 20, 1944·No. No. 10940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

Whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, finding the appellant guilty of membership in a conspiracy to violate the internal revenue laws relating to moonshine liquor, depends upon the weight that is accorded a number of pertinent circumstances, none of which, standing alone, would be sufficient to sustain a conviction. It is the jury’s province to determine the weight that should be given to the circumstances, singly and collectively, and to determine, under the proper instructions of the Court (as were apparently given in this case), whether or not those circumstances exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than the guilt of the defendant. The only substantial issue in this case is the question of the weight of the evidence as applied to numerous relevant and material circumstances. The jury, acting within the scope of its function and with justification, has found the defendant guilty. Its findings will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whaley v. United States, 141 F.2d 1010, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3844 (5th Cir. 1944).

141 F.2d 1010 (Whaley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gangl v. State
612 So. 2d 333 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
Corbin v. State
585 So. 2d 713 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1991)
Tanner v. United States
192 F.2d 389 (Fifth Circuit, 1951)