Whaley v. State

382 So. 2d 802, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1980·No. No. PP-387·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whaley appeals his sentence of 30 years imposed under the enhanced penalty statute, raising the procedural issue that the trial court failed to specifically find from a preponderance of the evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public to sentence the appellant to an extended term. Upon consideration of the record and precedent on this point, we conclude such a finding is required. § 775.084(3) and (3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1979); Levy v. State, 375 So.2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Grimmett v. State, 357 So.2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See Adams v. State, 376 So.2d 47, 58-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Fry v. State, 359 So.2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). The sentence is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for appropriate findings and imposition of sentence accordingly.

McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whaley v. State, 382 So. 2d 802, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

382 So. 2d 802 (Whaley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
414 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Ruiz v. State
384 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
George v. Woodville Lumber Co.
382 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)