Whaley v. Gale

12 N.W. 33, 48 Mich. 193, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 772
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 19, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 N.W. 33 (Whaley v. Gale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whaley v. Gale, 12 N.W. 33, 48 Mich. 193, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 772 (Mich. 1882).

Opinion

Marston, J.

This cause was commenced and tried in justice’s court where the plaintiff recovered a judgment. On certiorari to the circuit the judgment of the justice was reversed. The case comes here on writ of error.

"We have examined the errors alleged in the affidavit for the writ of certiorari. The objections made to the admission of certain testimony were not well taken. In order to reverse the judgment of a justice rendered upon the merits, for the rejection or admission of evidence, it should appear clearly that the party against whom the judgment was rendered was injured by the ruling.

The evidence offered and admitted on the part of the plaintiff tended to prove a valid binding agreement; the delivery of railroad ties at a place agreed upon and marking them as the defendant had directed. This was denied by the defendant. If the plaintiff’s testimony and that of his witnesses was true, there was a delivery, and thus the case was taken out of the operation of the statute of frauds, and whether true or not was a question for the justice.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed and that of the justice affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kendrick v. Hochradel
132 N.W. 521 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 N.W. 33, 48 Mich. 193, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whaley-v-gale-mich-1882.