Whaley v. Department of Corrections

852 P.2d 200, 120 Or. App. 224, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 702
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 12, 1993·No. CA A69239·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

*225 PER CURIAM

Petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 291-158-005; OAR 291-158-010; OAR 291-158-015 and OAR 291-158-015(10) as not having been adopted in compliance with the notice provision of ORS 183.335(2)(a) and OAR chapter 291, division 1. The notice given complied with the applicable statute and administrative rules.

Rules held valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whaley v. Department of Corrections, 852 P.2d 200, 120 Or. App. 224, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 702 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

852 P.2d 200 (Whaley v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kolbe v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Rothauge v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Smith v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Brown v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
McClure v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Davidson v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Sager v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Dumler v. Department of Corrections
852 P.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)