Whaley v. Bowen

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whaley v. Bowen

98 So. 322, 19 Ala. App. 502, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 294

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 1923

Docket5 Div. 483.

StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 322 (Whaley v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whaley v. Bowen, 98 So. 322, 19 Ala. App. 502, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 294 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The only assignment of error is to the action of the trial court in overruling a motion for now trial.

Upon a careful examination, we find that no exceptions were reserved on the trial; neither the record nor the bill of exceptions shows the motion for new trial, or what it contained. In this state of the record, there is not sufficient exception presented upon which this court could predicate error.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. v

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The only assignment of error is to the action of the trial court in overruling a motion for now trial.

Upon a careful examination, we find that no exceptions were reserved on the trial; neither the record nor the bill of exceptions shows the motion for new trial, or what it contained. In this state of the record, there is not sufficient exception presented upon which this court could predicate error.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. v

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 So. 322, 19 Ala. App. 502, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whaley-v-bowen-alactapp-1923.