Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Whaley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.

Whaley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.

65 S.E. 1022, 84 S.C. 189, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 236
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 9, 1909
Docket7365
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 1022 (Whaley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whaley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 65 S.E. 1022, 84 S.C. 189, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 236 (S.C. 1909).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice PIydrick.

A consignee has no cause of action against a carrier for failure to deliver goods consigned for sale by him as agent of the consignor, the title being in the consignor. Parker v. Jacobs, 14 S. C., 112; Hill v. R. R. Co., 43 S. C., 461, 22 S. E., 337; Matheson v. Ry., 79 S. C., 155, 60 S. E., 437.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middleton & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
110 S.E. 796 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 1022, 84 S.C. 189, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whaley-v-atlantic-coast-line-r-r-sc-1909.