Whalen v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Whalen v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

174 A.D. 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 923 (Whalen v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whalen v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 174 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rule 36 of the G-eneral Rules of Practice is, by its express terms, applicable only after an issue of fact has been joined. Section 480 of the Code of Civil Procedure states the proper remedy. It is within the legitimate discretion of the Special Term to deny, upon the terms prescribed in the order, a motion made under that section. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rule 36 of the G-eneral Rules of Practice is, by its express terms, applicable only after an issue of fact has been joined. Section 480 of the Code of Civil Procedure states the proper remedy. It is within the legitimate discretion of the Special Term to deny, upon the terms prescribed in the order, a motion made under that section. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whalen-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-nyappdiv-1916.