Home/New York Court of Appeals/Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY

Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY

11 N.Y.3d 885
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 17, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 11 N.Y.3d 885 (Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whalen v. DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY, 11 N.Y.3d 885 (N.Y. 2008).

Opinion

11 N.Y.3d 885 (2008)

ALICE WHALEN, Respondent,
v.
DEGRAFF, FOY, CONWAY, HOLTHARRIS & MEALEY, Now Known as DEGRAFF, FOY, KUNZ & DEVINE, LLP, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted November 3, 2008.
Decided December 17, 2008.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *886 the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 N.Y.3d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whalen-v-degraff-foy-conway-holtharris-mealey-ny-2008.