Whalen v. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING
10 A.3d 900, 608 Pa. 142, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2984
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 22, 2010
Docket229 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 10 A.3d 900 (Whalen v. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Whalen v. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, 10 A.3d 900, 608 Pa. 142, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2984 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
*143 ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does [Licensee’s] acceptance of ARD for his second DUI charge establish a DUI violation and thereby trigger the statutory ignition-interlock requirement where: the general assembly and the courts have consistently treated the acceptance of ARD for a DUI charge as an adjudication mandating the imposition of suspensions or revocations, even where the language of the statute required conviction; and the statute at issue here only requires a violation and suspension in order to require installation of an ignition interlock as a condition of license restoration?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whalen v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
32 A.3d 677 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 A.3d 900, 608 Pa. 142, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whalen-v-commonwealth-department-of-transportation-bureau-of-driver-pa-2010.