Whalen v. Board of Supervisors of Albany
This text of 6 How. Pr. 278 (Whalen v. Board of Supervisors of Albany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question in this ease is whether the defects specified are sufficient to warrant us in setting aside the judgment. These defects, such as they were, were waived by the plaintiff appearing before the referee and arguing the cause without any objection. Besides, we think, the stipulation by its terms was sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the referee, and we should feel bound, even now, to order [279]*279a rule of reference to be entered upon it nunc fro tunc. The decision of the judge below must be affirmed in this and the four other causes depending on the same question, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 How. Pr. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whalen-v-board-of-supervisors-of-albany-nysupct-1851.