W.H. v. State
559 So. 2d 464, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2841, 1990 WL 49830
This text of 559 So. 2d 464 (W.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
W.H. v. State, 559 So. 2d 464, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2841, 1990 WL 49830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the adjudication of delinquency. The confession was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); the trial court, therefore, erred in denying W.H.’s motion to suppress.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 464, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2841, 1990 WL 49830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wh-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.