Weymouth v. Dunn
82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145
Opinion
Verdict for plaintiff. The rescript says: "This is an action upon a promissory note. The vital question was whether the signature purporting to be that of one of the defendants, James Rowe, was genuine. He denied it. A careful comparison of his admitted signature with that upon the note so strongly corroborates his denial, that, in the opinion of the court, a new trial should be granted.
Motion sustained.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weymouth v. Dunn, 82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145 (Me. 1911).
82 A. 1134 (Weymouth v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.