Weymouth v. Dunn

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Weymouth v. Dunn

82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145

DecidedJuly 14, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 1134 (Weymouth v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weymouth v. Dunn, 82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145 (Me. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Verdict for plaintiff. The rescript says: "This is an action upon a promissory note. The vital question was whether the signature purporting to be that of one of the defendants, James Rowe, was genuine. He denied it. A careful comparison of his admitted signature with that upon the note so strongly corroborates his denial, that, in the opinion of the court, a new trial should be granted.

Motion sustained.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Verdict for plaintiff. The rescript says: "This is an action upon a promissory note. The vital question was whether the signature purporting to be that of one of the defendants, James Rowe, was genuine. He denied it. A careful comparison of his admitted signature with that upon the note so strongly corroborates his denial, that, in the opinion of the court, a new trial should be granted.

Motion sustained.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weymouth-v-dunn-me-1911.