Weymouth v. Dunn

82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 14, 1911·Published

Opinion

Verdict for plaintiff. The rescript says: "This is an action upon a promissory note. The vital question was whether the signature purporting to be that of one of the defendants, James Rowe, was genuine. He denied it. A careful comparison of his admitted signature with that upon the note so strongly corroborates his denial, that, in the opinion of the court, a new trial should be granted.

Motion sustained.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weymouth v. Dunn, 82 A. 1134, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 145 (Me. 1911).

82 A. 1134 (Weymouth v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.