Weyl-Zuckerman & Co. v. Schnell
115 A. 182, 96 N.J.L. 558, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 224
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Mjnturn, Kaltscn, Black, Herpeniieimhr, "William s, Gardner, "Van Bus kirk, JJ. 11.
For rerenal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weyl-Zuckerman & Co. v. Schnell, 115 A. 182, 96 N.J.L. 558, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 224 (N.J. 1921).
115 A. 182 (Weyl-Zuckerman & Co. v. Schnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.