Weyl v. Rosenberger
161 A.D. 911, 145 N.Y.S. 1149
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 161 A.D. 911 (Weyl v. Rosenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weyl v. Rosenberger, 161 A.D. 911, 145 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that the motion for a non-suit was improperly granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 A.D. 911, 145 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weyl-v-rosenberger-nyappdiv-1914.