Wexner v. Gruenapple

127 A.D. 179, 111 N.Y.S. 280, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A.D. 179 (Wexner v. Gruenapple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wexner v. Gruenapple, 127 A.D. 179, 111 N.Y.S. 280, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Miller, J.:

The plaintiff, a member of the defendant lodge, has recovered a judgment for sick benefits for thirteen weeks, amounting to seventy dollars. One of the defendant’s by-laws, prepared by a committee of which the plaintiff was a member, provided : Sick benefit is [180]*180payable only then when the elected physician of the -Lodge and the Sick Committee reports a member sick and unable tó work.”

The plaintiff -does not assert that he was not bound by said by-law, and it is undisputed that the physician of the lodge refused tomake the required certificate, but certified to the contrary. Something is said respecting an appeal to the grand lodge, and a decision by that body, but there is no proper proof of such a decision or of any law of the order respecting its effect.

The judgment must be reversed.

Woodward, Jerks, Hooker and Gaykor, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Messing v. Order of the Golden Seal
154 N.Y.S. 475 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D. 179, 111 N.Y.S. 280, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wexner-v-gruenapple-nyappdiv-1908.