Wexler v. National Ben Franklin Insurance

160 Misc. 282, 289 N.Y.S. 866, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1214
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 1, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s property was directly and specifically insured by the Camden Fire Insurance Association policy. The evidence established that neither the named insured nor plaintiff [283]*283regarded plaintiff’s property damaged by the fire as covered by defendant’s policies. The acts of the parties after the fire did not amount to an adoption of the insurance under defendants’ policies, for plaintiff’s benefit and plaintiff did not comply with the conditions required therein for notice and proof of claim. The National Ben Franklin Insurance Company policy was clearly for the benefit of the named insured, indemnifying him against direct loss, and also his legal liability, if any, to others. The clause in Great American Insurance Company policy, “ loss, if any, to be adjusted with and payable to Pearl Co. etc.” was designed to have similar effect.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Hammer and Callahan, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wexler v. National Ben Franklin Insurance, 160 Misc. 282, 289 N.Y.S. 866, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

160 Misc. 282 (Wexler v. National Ben Franklin Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co. of Philadelphia
262 A.D. 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)