Wexler v. Levy
This text of 241 A.D. 884 (Wexler v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order resettling order denying motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. It was a proper exercise of discretion of the court at Special Term to refuse to vacate the receivership in view of the fact that, admittedly, the plaintiff, the owner of the second mortgage foreclosed, had been required to pay approximately $5,000 arrearages in taxes, water charges and interest on the first mortgage for the years 1932 and 1933, which the defendants, mortgagors, had failed and neglected to pay. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wexler-v-levy-nyappdiv-1934.