Wexler v. Chase Manhattan Bank
This text of 13 A.D.2d 757 (Wexler v. Chase Manhattan Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Determination of the Appellate Term unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. Concur — Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.; Breitel, J. P., and Rabin, J., concur in the result in the following memorandum by Breitel, J. P.: I concur in the result on the authority of the rationale expressed in American Defense Soc. v. Sherman Nat. Bank (225 N. Y. 506). Otherwise I would have, as a novel proposition, voted to reverse and deny summary judgment to plaintiff and thus follow the provision in the Uniform Commercial Code (§ A-403).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 A.D.2d 757, 217 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wexler-v-chase-manhattan-bank-nyappdiv-1961.