Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.

93 A.2d 454, 372 Pa. 250, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 501

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 5, 1953

DocketAppeal, No. 249

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 93 A.2d 454 (Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co., 93 A.2d 454, 372 Pa. 250, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 501 (Pa. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial, the assigned reason being that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. President Judge Brown in his opinion reviewed the evidence at length. We are unable to discover any palpable abuse of discretion and therefore decline to disturb such exercise of discretion: Bellettiere v. Philadelphia, 367 Pa. 638, 81 A. 2d 857; Beal v. Reading Company, 370 Pa. 45, 87 A. 2d 214.

Order • affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial, the assigned reason being that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. President Judge Brown in his opinion reviewed the evidence at length. We are unable to discover any palpable abuse of discretion and therefore decline to disturb such exercise of discretion: Bellettiere v. Philadelphia, 367 Pa. 638, 81 A. 2d 857; Beal v. Reading Company, 370 Pa. 45, 87 A. 2d 214.

Order • affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.2d 454, 372 Pa. 250, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wexler-v-bonwit-teller-co-pa-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack