Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.
93 A.2d 454, 372 Pa. 250, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 501
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 5, 1953·No. Appeal, No. 249·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Opinion
The appeal is by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial, the assigned reason being that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. President Judge Brown in his opinion reviewed the evidence at length. We are unable to discover any palpable abuse of discretion and therefore decline to disturb such exercise of discretion: Bellettiere v. Philadelphia, 367 Pa. 638, 81 A. 2d 857; Beal v. Reading Company, 370 Pa. 45, 87 A. 2d 214.
Order • affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co., 93 A.2d 454, 372 Pa. 250, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 501 (Pa. 1953).
93 A.2d 454 (Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crouse v. Smith
113 A.2d 223 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Pendleton v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
103 A.2d 724 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)