Weubker v. James

270 A.D. 955, 62 N.Y.S.2d 761

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court. The landlords failed to serve a notice to vacate on the Price Administrator in the rent area. The City Court dismissed the proceeding for that reason on jurisdictional grounds. The County Court reversed that decision and remitted the matter to the City Court for trial. From that order both tenant and the Price Administrator appealed to this court. Pending the appeal the landlords and the tenant entered into a stipulation voluntarily withdrawing the appeal, without costs. The intervener alone is pressing the cause for decision.

We have examined the. question of law involved. In our opinion the decision of the City Court is correct and the determination of the County Court is erroneous as a-matter of law. However the real parties in interest have discontinued the proceeding and there is no judgment which this court can render and enforce. The question involved is not of sufficient public importance to warrant a decision on the merits. (Matter of Lyons Co. v. Morris, 261 N. Y. 497.)

The appeal is therefore dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weubker v. James, 270 A.D. 955, 62 N.Y.S.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 955 (Weubker v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockerty v. Phillips
319 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Yakus v. United States
321 U.S. 414 (Supreme Court, 1944)
Bowles v. Willingham
321 U.S. 503 (Supreme Court, 1944)
International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.
62 N.E.2d 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Matter of Lyon Co. v. Morris
185 N.E. 711 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Sanders v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.
45 N.E.2d 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Sanders v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc.
264 A.D. 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)