Wetzler v. State

18 Ind. 35
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The information charges that Wetzler, “on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, being the 20th of January, 1861, &o., &c., was found at common labor, unlawfully, to-wit: selling three gills of spirituous liquor to one Green Durbin,” &e. The evidence shows that the liquor was sold in the defendant’s bar-room, by his bar-keeper; but there was no evidence tending to show that the defendant was present when the sale was made, or had any knowledge whatever of the selling when it was done. The evidence is plainly insufficient to sustain the conviction. Hipp v. The State, 5 Blackf. 144.

The judgment is reversed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wetzler v. State, 18 Ind. 35 (Ind. 1862).

18 Ind. 35 (Wetzler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walters v. State
92 N.E. 537 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Rosenbaum v. State
57 N.E. 156 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)
State ex rel. Denney v. Leach
46 N.E. 549 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
State v. Kittelle
110 N.C. 560 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)