Wetzler v. Silverman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wetzler v. Silverman

123 N.Y.S. 794

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 794 (Wetzler v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wetzler v. Silverman, 123 N.Y.S. 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order which dismisses the complaint without costs. The appeal is from that provision of the order which denies the defendants costs on the granting of the dismissal.

[795]*795In Murthey v. Burke, 121 App. Div. 400, 106 N. Y. Supp. 98, Mr. Justice Hirschberg, writing for the court, said:

“The order cannot be sustained. It is provided by section 822 of the Code of Civil Procedure that, where a plaintiff unreasonably neglects to proceed in an action, the court may, in its discretion, upon application of the defendant, dismiss the complaint and render judgment accordingly. The discretion having been exercised in favor of the defendant, judgment in his favor necessarily follows. The judgment is a final one, and by virtue of the provisions of sections 3228 and 3229 of the Code of Civil Procedure costs belong to the defendant as a matter of right. This was held many years ago in Tillspaugh v. Dick, 8 How. Prac. 33; Parker, J., saying: ‘The dismissal of the complaint 'was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and entitled him to recover whatever items of costs are given by the Code for services rendered.’ ”

The order appealed from should be so modified as to provide for the payment of costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order which dismisses the complaint without costs. The appeal is from that provision of the order which denies the defendants costs on the granting of the dismissal.

[795]*795In Murthey v. Burke, 121 App. Div. 400, 106 N. Y. Supp. 98, Mr. Justice Hirschberg, writing for the court, said:

“The order cannot be sustained. It is provided by section 822 of the Code of Civil Procedure that, where a plaintiff unreasonably neglects to proceed in an action, the court may, in its discretion, upon application of the defendant, dismiss the complaint and render judgment accordingly. The discretion having been exercised in favor of the defendant, judgment in his favor necessarily follows. The judgment is a final one, and by virtue of the provisions of sections 3228 and 3229 of the Code of Civil Procedure costs belong to the defendant as a matter of right. This was held many years ago in Tillspaugh v. Dick, 8 How. Prac. 33; Parker, J., saying: ‘The dismissal of the complaint 'was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and entitled him to recover whatever items of costs are given by the Code for services rendered.’ ”

The order appealed from should be so modified as to provide for the payment of costs, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetzler-v-silverman-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack