Wetzel v. Kindler

181 L. Ed. 2d 1008, 132 S. Ct. 1089, 565 U.S. 1173, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 696, 80 U.S.L.W. 3427, 2012 WL 117815
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 17, 2012
DocketNo. 11-48
StatusPublished

This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 1008 (Wetzel v. Kindler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetzel v. Kindler, 181 L. Ed. 2d 1008, 132 S. Ct. 1089, 565 U.S. 1173, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 696, 80 U.S.L.W. 3427, 2012 WL 117815 (U.S. 2012).

Opinion

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Third Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 642 F.3d 398.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kindler v. Horn
642 F.3d 398 (Third Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 1008, 132 S. Ct. 1089, 565 U.S. 1173, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 696, 80 U.S.L.W. 3427, 2012 WL 117815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetzel-v-kindler-scotus-2012.