Wetzel v. Bessemer Bar Ass'n.

5 So. 2d 722, 242 Ala. 164, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 12
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1942
Docket6 Div. 947.
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 5 So. 2d 722 (Wetzel v. Bessemer Bar Ass'n.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetzel v. Bessemer Bar Ass'n., 5 So. 2d 722, 242 Ala. 164, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 12 (Ala. 1942).

Opinion

THOMAS, Justice.

The review of an order made in a proceeding for contempt of court is by way of an appropriate extraordinary writ and not by appeal. 13 Corpus Juris 101; 17 C.J.S., Contempt, § 117; In re James H. Willis et al., post, p. 284, 5 So.2d 716.

It may be said that the remedy for review in contempt proceedings is by certiorari if the party in contempt is not in prison and by habeas corpus if the party in contempt is in prison. Robertson v. State, 20 Ala.App. 514, 104 So. 561; Ex parte Bankhead, 200 Ala. 102, 75 So. 478; Ex parte Dickens, 162 Ala. 272, 50 So. 218. For annotations on review in civil contempt see 28 A.L.R. 33.

The appellant has not pursued the proper remedy. In re James H. Willis et al., supra; Ex parte Connor et al., 240 Ala. 327, 198 So. 850; Board of Revenue of Covington County v. Merrill, 193 Ala. 521, 68 So. 971; Ex parte Dickens, 162 Ala. 272, 277, 50 So. 218, supra; Easton v. State, 39 Ala. 551, 87 Am.Dec. 49.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken and the appeal is dismissed on the grounds of the lack of jurisdiction.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

GARDNER, C. J., BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Reaves
531 So. 2d 853 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Carter v. State Ex Rel. Bullock County
393 So. 2d 1368 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Opinion by the Clerk
381 So. 2d 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1980)
Parmer v. Parmer
373 So. 2d 845 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
Johnson v. Johnson
311 So. 2d 319 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Knight v. State ex rel. Butler
261 So. 2d 750 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Jones v. Kendrick Realty Co.
252 So. 2d 61 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Local 7918 United Mine Workers of America
274 So. 2d 637 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Hardy v. Hardy
240 So. 2d 598 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1970)
Lovelady v. Lovelady
206 So. 2d 886 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Ex Parte Abercrombie
172 So. 2d 43 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Nelson v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.
157 So. 2d 23 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Shuttlesworth v. State
151 So. 2d 734 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1962)
Worley v. Worley
100 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Jordan v. Jordan
96 So. 2d 809 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Ex Parte Hennies
34 So. 2d 17 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Ex Parte Hacker
33 So. 2d 324 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Scola v. Scola
59 N.E.2d 773 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Ex Parte Wetzel
8 So. 2d 824 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 So. 2d 722, 242 Ala. 164, 1942 Ala. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetzel-v-bessemer-bar-assn-ala-1942.