Wetz, Russell Wade
This text of Wetz, Russell Wade (Wetz, Russell Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm and sentenced to sixty years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective due to a conflict of interest. The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we deny this application. After conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with the trial court's factual findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we adopt the trial court's factual findings and deny this application; however, we do not adopt its conclusions of law. We review a trial court's conclusions of law de novo. Ex parte Ellis, 233 S.W.3d 324, 331 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
Filed: July 2, 2008
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wetz, Russell Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetz-russell-wade-texcrimapp-2008.