Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co.
This text of 127 A. 323 (Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a workmen’s compensation case, in which the petitioner had an award for the death of her husband, Charles C. Wettstein, in the workmen’s compensation bureau. On an appeal to the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, the award was affirmed. The dominant facts are undisputed. The questions involved are, whether the accident resulting in the death of Charles C. Wettstein arose out of and in the course of his employment, and, if so, whether his death was the result of disobedience of his superior’s orders. The facts are clearly and concisely summarized in the opinion filed by Judge Logue in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county. We are satisfied with that opinion. The judgment of that court is affirmed, for the reasons stated Hi the opinion filed by Judge Logue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A. 323, 3 N.J. Misc. 99, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wettstein-v-whitall-tatum-co-nj-1925.