Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co.

127 A. 323, 3 N.J. Misc. 99, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 359
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 23, 1925·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This is a workmen’s compensation case, in which the petitioner had an award for the death of her husband, Charles C. Wettstein, in the workmen’s compensation bureau. On an appeal to the Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, the award was affirmed. The dominant facts are undisputed. The questions involved are, whether the accident resulting in the death of Charles C. Wettstein arose out of and in the course of his employment, and, if so, whether his death was the result of disobedience of his superior’s orders. The facts are clearly and concisely summarized in the opinion filed by Judge Logue in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county. We are satisfied with that opinion. The judgment of that court is affirmed, for the reasons stated Hi the opinion filed by Judge Logue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co., 127 A. 323, 3 N.J. Misc. 99, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 359 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 323 (Wettstein v. Whitall-Tatum Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. DeFuria
112 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Waskevitz v. Clifton Paper Board Co.
71 A.2d 646 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Flynn v. George A. Hormel & Co.
46 A.2d 148 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1946)
Capital Transit Co. v. Hoage
84 F.2d 235 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)