Wettstein v. Bankers National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Wettstein v. Bankers National Bank

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 466

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1914·No. No. 13829·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. See journal entry.

The defendant in error consenting that a remittitur be entered for all interest included in this judgment in excess of six per cent., amounting to $-. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that said remittitur in said amount of $- be entered, and that the rest and residue of the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby; affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. See journal entry.

The defendant in error consenting that a remittitur be entered for all interest included in this judgment in excess of six per cent., amounting to $-. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that said remittitur in said amount of $- be entered, and that the rest and residue of the judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby; affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Wettstein v. Bankers National Bank, 89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 466 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

89 Ohio St. (N.S.) 466 (Wettstein v. Bankers National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.